Art courtesy cavmag.com |
But in searching for that art, I discovered some interesting things. I had not seen any new Otis Sweat art in years, but he's still out there creating. And maybe everyone already knew this, but Otis Sweat is apparently his real name, not a pseudonym. Seriously, you couldn't make up a better name than that. It has a lot more cachet than, for example, 'Cameroon Wildebeest, Jr.'
I also discovered that in addition to his vast ouevre of sex art, he's done editorial illustration for the Miami Herald and the Washington Post. This is interesting to me because, as I've mentioned previously, I adopted the 'Wildebeest' pseudonym primarily to protect my 'mainstream' art/marketing/media career. But Sweat has apparently juggled sex art and 'mainstream' art successfully.
He's another of those guys who make me wonder why I even bother to do this stuff. He's Clapton, and I'm a teenager strumming 'Kumbaya'. I love what he does with skin tones, and it's influenced the way I draw them. At one point, years ago, I was consciously mimicking Sweat's handling of skin tones and highlights.
Sweat's work has an almost hyperrealistic quality at first glance. After you look at it for a few minutes, though, you notice that what he was doing in his Dugent Publishing days, at least, actually bordered on caricature, and it was this careful exaggeration that created the sense of hyperrealism. This is a technique he shares with Neal Adams, and, to some extent, Norman Rockwell. (Yes, I'm seriously comparing Norman Rockwell and Otis Sweat. It's about time somebody did.)
I dont mean to sound harsh but I rate your work higher than Mr Sweats. His work perhaps impresses some, but to me it just makes me think of Alfred E Neuman. And that is really not a mental image you want.
ReplyDeleteSo dont sell yourself short.
I've always found Sweat's work to blur the line between the real and the surreal in a way that I had not seen...his work is absolutely stunning!
ReplyDeleteI hadn't seen his work before.Thanks for that. Interesting point you make about exaggeration
ReplyDeleteand it's relationship to realism. I hadn't heard it put like that. It makes sense. It's what Neal Adams does alright. Lightbulb, Ding! Now you got me all distracted and I'm gonna walk into a wall now. I do that all the time...
As Staggler said, I personally like your work better. But it's all about style. Yours is different. Hard to say who is "better"...the whole beholder and eye thing. We don't know if Sweat even likes catfights...I don't anyway. I know when I was making my 3D catfights, they had to be sexy hot to me or I wasn't finished.
ReplyDelete-Rik3D
Sweat has a variety of styles. A lot of his stuff is truly "cartoonish". While other works would look fine in the Wall Street Journal.
ReplyDeleteOne of his "cartoonish" pieces for Cavalier was a great fight between a brunette in jeans and tee-shirt and a blonde bombshell in a sexy gown. The girls narrate the fight while they’re beating the shit out of each other.
I don’t know if he’s a fan, he mostly plays catfights for laughs. One of the reasons he may be so causal about his work is that he’s only doing what he gets paid for.
I used to see his stuff in Cavalier - liked it but I always wanted to see him do a serious catfight just to see what it would look like.
ReplyDelete